SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: niceguy767 who wrote (7069)8/30/2000 10:35:18 PM
From: MaverickRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Kumar chastises INTC for 1.13 GHz mishap, praises AMD, an upgrade from him in the offing ?
05:01 PM ET 08/29/00Latest Intel recall hurts its image - analysts
By Nicole Volpe NEW YORK, Aug 29 (Reuters) - A recall of Intel Corp.'s
fastest chip was not expected to hurt the chipmaker's
financial results, but this latest in a series of technical
snafus would damage its reputation, analysts said on Tuesday.
"While the financial impact is negligible it makes Intel
look bad to their customers," U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray
analyst Ashok Kumar wrote in a note to clients. "The company is
announcing products they cannot ship, and it turns out, do not
even work properly." Intel, whose processors are the brains of 80 percent of
personal computers, only announced the new 1.13 gigahertz chip
in July. It said Monday it had discovered the chip could fail
under a certain combination of data, voltage and temperatureconditions.
The new chip, Intel's fastest, is targeted at a niche
market of computer hobbyists and "power users" whose computers
are running the most taxing applications. Intel said the recall
would have no material effect on sales or earnings.
Shares were little changed by the news, closing up 3/16 to74-1/16 on Nasdaq.
An Intel spokesman said the chip had only shipped to "a
handful of customers," including International Business
Machines Corp. and Dell Computer Corp. , but
declined to comment on exactly how many chips had been shipped.
"We estimate that the company has shipped less than 10,000
units and, as such, the financial toll is negligible," said
Kumar. "Also, given that these products populate high-end
systems priced at about $3,000, the opportunity cost isminimal."
While the recall was small in size, it was not the first.
In 1995, Intel recalled its first Pentium due to a flaw, in
what was cited by then-chief executive Andrew Grove in his book
"Only the Paranoid Survive" as a defining event for the company
as it became a household name.
Last year, Intel recalled its Intel 820 chipset due to a
design flaw in technology provided by Rambus Inc. In
May, Intel recalled defective motherboards -- the internal
chasis that hold memory components in personal computers.
Salomon Smith Barney analyst Jonathan Joseph said that the
small size of the current recall made it "no big deal."
"This is not a black eye, this is a nit," he said. "The
magnitude of this recall is infinitesimal. It is in no way
comparable to the 1995 Pentium recall."
But Kumar said the implications of the recall were more
serious than its size would suggest. He blamed Intel's race
against AMD to the claim to the fastest chip as part of theproblem.
"This is another sign that the 1.13 gigahertz chip is
pushing the envelope for an architecture developed for 2
gigahertz speeds," he said, pointing out that Intel had missed
the transition to copper interconnects on its 0.18 micron
process, and was using a core that was five years old.
"Essentially they are pushing an aging architecture to keep
pace with AMD's Athlon, to have bragging rights to the fastest
processor," he said. "Intel should have introduced the P4 a
long time ago. Their research and development budget is much
larger than AMD's. That they can't keep pace with such a small
competitor as AMD speaks volumes about the company."
"Intel having this reoccur on a constant basis is just
stretching the relationships with OEMs," he said, referring to
original equipment manufacturers such as IBM and Dell.
However, those computer makers, which both received
shipments of the faulty chips, said they did not yet see cause
to alter their relationships with Intel.
IBM had begun shipping some Aptiva desktop computers with
the chips, a spokesman said.
"We don't know exactly what we are going to replace these
chips right now," said IBM spokesman Tim Blair, adding that IBM
was working on how to get parts back from customers.
Dell Computer Corp. had planned to ship products
with the new chip last Friday, and was told by Intel to hold
off, a Dell spokesman said.
"We were taking orders starting July 31 and anticipating
shipment on Aug. 25, when some of issues began to come up,"
said Dell spokesman Tom Kehoe. "We found out on Monday we would
not able to ship them at all, so we will be offering a 1
gigahertz system to those who have placed orders."
Dell, which relies solely on Intel for its processors,
would not have any material impact to sales or earnings, and
was not considering a change in their relationship with Intel,Kehoe said.
((--New York Newsdesk (212) 859-1700))