SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chic_hearne who wrote (123327)8/30/2000 11:23:14 PM
From: richard surckla  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570548
 
chic... You little devil you. You told me you were shorting Rambus but you didn't say you had an investment in AMD. I'm going to have to remember that.

Also, Believe what Watzman tells you. Heed his words.

PS. Your shorted Rambus at 81$. Did you cover or are you going for more? Just curious.



To: chic_hearne who wrote (123327)8/31/2000 8:45:50 AM
From: that_crazy_doug  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570548
 
<< There isn't going to be quantity of DRDRAM around next year, so these benchmarks don't make one bit of difference to me even if true. >>

If the benchmarks are true, everyone would want RDRRAM and it'd be around real fast.

I don't have a lot of faith in them either, because they are in general too extreme all around. (way to low in the bad parts and way too high in the good parts) but you never know.

Either way, if Rambus offers significant performance gains it will likely win out in the end. If it turns out to be the best technology, I hope it does win. AMD will have rambus chipsets if it needs them. If it doesn't offer anything over ddr even with the enhanced p4 bus then it will probably die the slow death that it would deserve.