SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (109107)8/31/2000 2:02:10 PM
From: Rob Young  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
"Rob, the point was that you have constantly poked fun at the Itanium schedule slips, yet you conveniently brush off
the Alpha schedule slips as if they don't matter."

Of course the big difference here is one is a shipping
product and the other isn't. PA8600 is past expected
shipping date so we can stick Alpha at 1 GHz, USIII,
PA86000 in the same bin? No. USIII isn't a shipping part.
21264 is, the 1 GHz version isn't. Hair splitting? Perhaps. But 21264 is still at the top of the Spec performance heap and will be doing much better RSN in
tpmC without being at 1 GHz.

"I fully expect a 733 MHz Itanium to be the equivalent of a 1 GHz 21264 Alpha."

That means nothing. Tell me what that means.

"Intel's apparent difficulty to get to 800 MHz"

That my friend is the least of their concerns. Their
greatest concerns are working OSes (that are beyond
alpha stage... ) Robust compilers. Get past those little
humps maybe we start talking about other things.

"So it seems that Intel isn't the only one who has been slipping up. What sayeth you, if Itanium debuts (at least in
pilot systems) in a month or two"

Sure... which OS ;-) Any of them beyond a raw alpha
stage yet? ;-)

"they demonstrate much better performance than the current Alphas"

That means nothing. Tell me what you mean by "performance."

---

"Depends on what your definition of IS is...."

Rob