SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: vvga who wrote (123428)9/1/2000 9:57:36 AM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570679
 
But a dual DDR channel architecture is exactly what NVidia has chosen to do with their controller for XBox. So a 128 bit, 200MHz DDR memory interface has a bandwidth of 6.4 GBytes per second. And I suspect that it isn't a high cost package, nor require more than 4 layers on the motherboard, considering it's intended market.



To: vvga who wrote (123428)9/1/2000 11:03:36 AM
From: that_crazy_doug  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1570679
 
<< Two DDR SDRAM "channels" will cost a boat-load of pins, not just a measly 30 pins, more like 100 pins. Yes you can build a dual DDR controller, but it may bump you into a significantly more expensive package. >>

What's the price per pin though, say it is 100 more pins. Let's say a pin costs 10 cents (over double the price most people quote, but just to show worst case scenario). That's $10 more in parts. Maybe some design complexity, and economy of scale works against you (low volume high end part at first) and another $30 bucks gets pushed onto the user. It's still hundreds cheaper for the solution than the rambus solution that would replace it.

Now if dual rambus channels on a willy with a 400mhz bus trounces dual channel DDR that's one thing, but if it only plays on par, the dual ddr board+ram would still be a much cheaper solution unless there is another huge drop ($100+) in rambus prices (and that's assuming the 600mhz stuff will be good enough).