Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (7237)	9/1/2000 12:58:06 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Ali, Great find! Based on this table, it's probably a good idea to stay away from all Intel processors over 866, and when highest reliability is required, probably 667 is the top. Notice the power requirements. They seem to be going up exponentially above 866 MHz, and they don't even list 1.13 GHz. Joe

To: Ali Chen who wrote (7237)	9/1/2000 1:36:44 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Ali, Nice catch! Does anyone remember me taking a bit of flack from PB last year when I said that A2 were not yielding much in the form of 800s and B stepping was needed to get the 800s into production? Now this is public domain stuff. Some folks are under the impression that Intel's paper launches began with 1.13 or may be 1G. Would be interesting to see if any Intel longs realize/acknowledge that Intel's paper launches began with 800MHz launch in December 1999. Chuck