Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Kim who wrote (107812)	9/1/2000 2:29:19 PM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Respond to of 164684

Frankly, the only person who I feel has been "nasty" to me is William. Bob, I am not trying to get involved here but I do not recall William being nasty with you. What was that about? Glenn

To: Bob Kim who wrote (107812)	9/1/2000 2:32:25 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

I posted on the thread when I bought webm, which was in the 120s, 80s and 90s. Its my favorite XML play but there are others tibx, beas and vitr. Otoh nobody can tell me where sqsw sits, what its potential is, who his competitors are, nothing. Of course it has been bantered about quite often on this thread and that seems to be fine but mention another stock and you get the same old "overvaluation" argument. So is sqsw overvalued or not? Look, I don't see HJ calling you a burger flipper or dizzy etc. My personal opinion is that he has some kind of problem with women. I don't know what happened on this thread when I wasn't here in the spring but this used to be a great investment thread. If you don't like Nuance thats fine, but to imply that someone is "pumping" a stock, and then turn around and hype another stock in the same space is kindof lame.