Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (21386)	9/4/2000 12:06:16 PM
From: MGV	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27311

Keep writing. The insight you provide about yourself provides the most eloquent argument available to disclose that you are a hack. Let me fill you in on at least one thing you don't understand. I'm skeptical about VLNC for many reasons but I'm more bullish than you on technology and global market development because I have much more reason to be bullish than you. What you write reveals you are a medicine show hack with a knack for exploiting psychological swings. Without the depth to understand more than that, you don't understand how bullish secular forces and global macroeconomic conditions are for long term equity market expansion. You are dicking around - if you are who you represent yourself to be - with a 900 line and a poorly regarded newsletter picking stocks on the basis of how well they work with your psychobabble instead of doing homework. I'll leave you with one tip. When the markets sell off, observe the companies that come back the quickest. There are reasons for that. Learn about it and maybe you won't have to be a hack writer using the modern equivalent of a medicine show wagon: a 900 line - to hock your wares. Now, answer this question or more people will begin to think you have more to hide. Message 14270738

To: da_cheif™ who wrote (21386)	9/4/2000 12:54:07 PM
From: Larry Brubaker	Respond to of 27311

Mr dacheif, presuming you are in fact Mr. Wolanchuk, no there is no time frame mentioned other than that implied when the article said "next generation cellphone." I don't follow MOT's products that closely, but I would be willing to wager there has been at least one edition of MOT's "next generation cellphone" that has come and gone since Feb. 1999, without a VLNC battery. And if you didn't mean to imply a time frame, why did you say "we know whose battery MOT's next generation cell phone will use?" Because a reader in February 1999 surely would have taken this to mean the next generation of the product, not a product to come out at some unspecified time in the future. Finally, I think stock touts as yourself, who have been falsely predicting big contracts and profits are imminent for years, do more harm to the credibility of the company than all the bashers combined.