Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (109295)	9/5/2000 1:48:01 PM
From: dmf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

GVTucker, RE: The long standing Intel policy of giving detailed guidance, and then giving an update when actual operations deviated from that guidance, is a sound policy, and is the best policy for long term shareholders. I agree. Now, if Intel has not given an update regarding operations deviating from their detailed guidance, why are we listening to Kumar and others who seem to be telling us they know before Intel does? Not trying to be argumentative here. Just thinking that Intel has established some credibility with their guidance and wondering why the market is more than willing to act on Kumar's guidance rather than Intel's. All replies appreciated. Need a little hand-holding here. At least while I read that Intel yields are not what I would expect and that the demand we've been reading about is not real. I think others understands my frustration. Trying to be rational. Trying not to scream, "Help!" Appreciative of all replies. Very, very. dmf