Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Car Nut Corner: All About Cars -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Susan S. who wrote (706)	9/5/2000 7:43:16 PM
From: who cares?	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 5790

Don't know. I have the same thing, that Jags traditionally have bad reliability, but I don't know about them since Ford took over. You could always ask Kenny. CMB PS, Do blondes have more fun?

To: Susan S. who wrote (706)	9/5/2000 8:47:17 PM
From: OldAIMGuy	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 5790

Hi SS, The newest Jag I own is a 1986, so I can't answer from first hand experience. From what I've heard, the "Ford" Jaguars are pretty nice automobiles and have had very little in the way of service problems since the newest generation of cars have been developed. I have a '53 XK 120 race car, a '61 Mk II Saloon and a '86 XJ6. All are great cars with loads of personality. My personal favorite is the '61. I drive it any time the streets aren't salty and the temp is above freezing! All the Kitties hibernate here in Wisconsin. Here's a forum for discussion of such things. It's sponsored by the Jaguar Clubs: catdriver.com Best regards, Tom execpc.com (Jaguar Race pages)