Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William JH who wrote (57899)	9/6/2000 12:09:04 AM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116759

That's not why I called you a clown - but as Bob Johnson has so correctly stated, things might be different if the 5leading producers controlled 50% of production rather than 25%. But they don't - that's the reality of the situation -and to some reality sucks - but there it is. They behave as if a handful of producers can control the market - even though the facts indicate otherwise. Benes himself is unable to see this - note how he flatters Bob Johnson for making the point which he cannot himself understand!! He flatters to deceive!! A browner who doesn't even know where his nose is!! That is why we're in a long cycle - only hardship and duress will force mergers and mine closings and we don't seem to be anywhere near to seeing it. You're a clown because you suggest that by supporting Barrick, and I have, at least on this thread, not on another, I must be on the company's payroll, be in contact with the company, etc. Having an opinion contrary to that of some of the conspiracy theorists seems too much for you to fathom?