Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mishedlo who wrote (52650)	9/6/2000 12:13:55 AM
From: richard surckla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

mishedlo... You asked me, "Why do you waste your time with this nonsense?" or something to that effect. And you were right. But now I see you trying to answer their every question. Bilow, Scumbria, NightRider, etc. As soon as you answer one, another's head pops up with more questions or challenges. No matter what your answer or explanation is, I assure you that they will tell you it is the wrong... no matter what. They are intent on wearing you down. So I ask you. "Why do you waste your time?"

To: mishedlo who wrote (52650)	9/6/2000 1:13:47 AM
From: jim kelley	Respond to of 93625

Nightowl works for the the other gang. <g> There seem to be a few errors in the post but it is substantially correct. We need to get a copy of the original article(s) that Rambus used to promote its ideas. Also a better set of dates for the RDRAM licenses and the date of introduction of the original PC-66 SDRAM. Newell thinks this was introduced in 1992 by Samsung before JEDEC. If so the RAMBUS ideas were known then.

To: mishedlo who wrote (52650)	9/6/2000 2:50:22 AM
From: NightOwl	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Mike, Now I am really getting worried. First I have no idea what I said that could be construed as "blasting" that repost from Jim K. I mean I have absolutely no recollection of ever having seen it before. ...although I have been known to forget things on occasion. <g> (...Of course, if I did "blast" it, it must have deserved it really bad.) <vbg> But what worries me is why you give a good flippin dip who "blasts" what. The "who" is just not relevant when it comes to "blasting" or being "blasted". Its the quality and artistic credibility of the "story-in-lights" that matters to the panel of judges. They just don't want a BIG BANG and then go off to bed. And they don't care "who" is lighting the match as long as they get a complete show. They want to be "Ooo'd and Aahhh'd", shocked and amazed or brought to tears. <g> 0\|0