Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (16210)	9/6/2000 11:32:23 AM
From: Perspective	Respond to of 436258

<Didn't she get the boot from W$W, for thinking unbullish thoughts?<NG> > Yep, and I think it pretty much coincided with the March highs, exactly like I figured it would. You have to discredit every non-consensus thinker before the secular bear can get underway, and that was an excellent symbolic marker for the event. Bring on da BEAR!!! BC

To: patron_anejo_por_favor who wrote (16210)	9/6/2000 11:38:28 AM
From: Gary M. Reed	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

PatronAnejo, What energy stuff do you like in here? I've been goofing around with stuff like MRO, GW and GOU, but am looking for something to throw some big $ at. Was it you who said earlier you were eyeballing some Canadian producers? Can't help but laugh at AlGore when he blames "the nasty big oil companies" for the rise in gasoline prices. Wasn't it the Clinton/Gore administration who gave their stamp of approval to the Exxon-Mobil merger, the BP-Amoco merger, etc.? If it's indeed "big oil" who is creating these higher energy prices, then why did their administration allow "big oil co's" to become "bigger oil co's"? Typical crap, give J6P the ol' spin, knowing full-well that J6P will take it at full-face value, never bothering to do any fact-checking.