Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ex-INTCfan who wrote (31963)	9/6/2000 2:08:46 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 35685

I don't agree. I think that there are some real differences which will affect the economy and the market, and I don't think that it is inappropriate to discuss them. Bush probably good for oil related, Gore for fuelcell/hybrids/digital power management. Drugs? I dunno, but either way, I anticipate I will take more of them (that's a given, even if we do away with the presidency). Net stocks...I dunno, I'm not all that up on most of this. Are Bush's tax cuts inflationary and going against the fed? How will their SS plans affect the market;if there is any privitization by any president, what will that do to the market both short and long term? Will it give the gvt.voting interest in companies by virtue of stocks it owns? (Cal.state employees retirement fund is an activist shareholder). All quite germane to getting rich thru stocks. TK