SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (35217)9/6/2000 4:48:29 PM
From: Mr. Whist  Respond to of 769667
 
Excellent post and link, Murali. Anyone with half a brain can see through GWB's debate dodge. This entire debate debacle has already cost GWB thousands of votes, and the longer it drags on, the more votes GWB will lose. There was a story in one of the papers yesterday saying that the GOP in D.C. wants to shuttle some more experienced advisers to Austin to run GWB's campaign. They don't like the direction it's going. No kidding.



To: microhoogle! who wrote (35217)9/6/2000 5:08:50 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 769667
 
the debates

"Should the government be in favor of activism on behalf of the needy, or should government be inert, yielding to private interests.

This is not a formulation a Republican can't ever hope to win-Reagan and Bush and Nixon won. But the odds tend to stack up on the side of the contender who wants "free" drugs for the elderly, rather than a return of surplus taxation to the rich. Gore has a stake in the audience that is there to be persuaded to act this November, in behalf of goodness and charity , rather than more money for the Rockefeller class.
Bush can't beg out, but he has the additional problem of an unsuccessful preparation of the potential voter to the implications of the Gore/Democratic/socialist polarizations.

The undecided voter hasn't been sensitized to the Republican/conservative position on the imprudencies of welfarism, and Gov. Bush reasonably calculates that he can't take on this post-graduate training in a couple of hours of network TV."

Wm. F Buckley column



To: microhoogle! who wrote (35217)9/6/2000 5:09:06 PM
From: Mr. Whist  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
AP National
Debate Dispute Reaches Congress

by JIM ABRAMS
Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The debate over debates spread from the presidential campaigns to Congress Wednesday, with Democrats saying Republicans were ducking a chance to discuss the issues.

House Democratic leader Dick Gephardt, in a letter to House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said he was ''disappointed'' that Hastert had declined an invitation from PBS's ''The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer'' for a debate among congressional leaders.

Gephardt, from Missouri, and Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota agreed to the proposed Oct. 15 debate, but Hastert and Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., declined, said Rob Flynn, director of communications for The NewsHour.

The Bush and Gore campaigns are at odds over the format for presidential debates. Vice President Al Gore has agreed to a proposal by the Commission on Presidential Debates for three 90-minute debates aired by all the major networks. Texas Gov. George W. Bush says he will participate in only one, plus appearances on CNN and NBC talk shows that will be broadcast only by their parent networks.

Gephardt said that given Bush's rejection of the three debates sponsored by the commission, ''your refusal raises questions about whether the leaders of the Republican party really want any honest discussion of the issues this year.''

Hastert spokesman John Feehery said the proposed debate, coming right at the end of the legislative session and the beginning of the election campaign, didn't fit in the speaker's schedule.

He added that the ''Democratic leadership was looking at the electoral map and, seeing they are not going to take back the majority, looking for a Hail Mary play.''

In 1996 ''The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer'' hosted a debate in Williamsburg, Va., among Gephardt, Daschle, Lott and then Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga.

Flynn said The NewsHour hoped to stage the debate with other Republican congressional leaders. Rep. J.C. Watts, R-Okla., the fourth-ranked Republican in the House, said he'd be willing to appear with Daschle and Gephardt.

''I think we've got a good story to tell,'' Watts said.



To: microhoogle! who wrote (35217)9/6/2000 5:10:20 PM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 769667
 
Hey Moroni, do you live in Texas? I have a bunch of clients in Texas and they LOVE Bush. Who cares what you think anyway? We've already established that you are irrelevant. JLA



To: microhoogle! who wrote (35217)9/6/2000 6:36:45 PM
From: iandiareii  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Newspapers and pundits coast-to-coast slam Bush debate dodge

Enough Gamesmanship


The Bush camp claimed Gore was playing games by making other debates contingent on the three set by the debate commission and argued that other debate sponsors deserve as much consideration as the commission. Not true.

The precedent was set in 1988, when Bush's father, George Bush, participated in the commission series. The commission's debate framework has become a part of American politics and has served the country and its voters well. Bush should abandon his gamesmanship and get on with the debates. A fair campaign demands it.

latimes.com

First, Three Big Debates

Where Mr. Gore should take a firm line, though, is in continuing to insist that Mr. Bush agree to the three commission debates with "roadblock," or all- network, coverage. When those debates are set, then the candidates can do any number of additional debates on Mr. King's or Mr. Russert's show or anyplace else, for that matter. The public is served by more debates, not fewer — and by preservation of the primacy of the Commission on Presidential Debates.
nytimes.com

Bush plays debate games


Like his father before him, Republican presidential nominee George W. Bush is playing games with a carefully formulated package for presidential debates by the bipartisan commission that has been running them even-handedly for the last three elections.
sunspot.net

Let the debates proceed

Sept. 6, 2000 - Texas Gov. George W. Bush should stop tap-dancing around the issue of debating Vice President Al Gore. The sooner the two go head-to-head, the better.

denverpost.com

Talk show
Mr. Bush feigns eagerness to tangle with his debate-savvy Democratic opponent, when what he's really doing is trying to stay safe in situations with congenial moderators and smaller audiences. His gambit responds to the letter but not to the spirit of Mr. Gore's offer to debate "anytime, anywhere." Mr. Gore is right to demand acceptance of the commission's three national debates as the prerequisite for extra debates.
web.philly.com

The debate debate

It is up to Bush to close the credibility gap. Rather than proposing a clumsy and last-minute reinvention of the wheel, the Bush campaign should agree to the broadcasting basics of bringing the candidates to the widest audience possible without stirring up distracting television turf wars.
boston.com

Bush play on debates misses the point

Whatever the unspun facts, George Bush is selling himself as a different sort of politician, with a plan to raise the tone of Washington political battles. By splitting hairs on debates, the Texas governor paints himself as someone who would be right at home in Washington without changing a thing.

usatoday.com

The debate dodger


It's time for some plain talk, as George W. Bush likes to say: Any man who runs from prime-time network debates doesn't deserve to be president. The governor and his explainers can spin like tops, but no serious voter believes that Bush has met Al Gore's debate challenge
salon.com

Demeaning the debates

George W. Bush insults voters and demeans the importance of the debates by the lame game of chicken that he's trying mightily to coax Al Gore into.
herald.com

Why Debates Matter

Mr. Bush further claims that Mr. Gore is breaking a promise to meet him in his chosen venues. But Mr. Gore is not breaking that promise. He is merely insisting that Mr. Bush should not use these lesser encounters as an excuse to avoid the big ones.

A healthy precedent had been established; but Mr. Bush's stance now threatens to return politics to the time when just one all-network encounter, or possibly even no encounter, is considered acceptable. A candidate who frequently pledges to uplift the nation's political culture should think twice before doing that.

washingtonpost.com

Bush campaign, trailing in polls, a bit out of kilter


It's obvious that Bush is trying to limit the length of the debates and the number of people who would see them.
star-telegram.com

Voters lose in debating game

Previous candidates, including the governor's father, President George Bush, found the commission system worthy of at least two appearances. The governor should honor that tradition and also agree to at least two debates.

The commission was created to eliminate competition for the debates and give maximum exposure to the candidates in a formal setting. By playing the networks against each other, Bush has aggravated the very problem the presidential debate commission sought to alleviate.

austin360.com