Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (51434)	9/7/2000 12:18:01 PM
From: Rich1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 63513

Carpino's cycles are arrived using various differnt cycles. Not all of which I am familiar with. Moon, pych and past years come into play. You can laugh, make fun of or whatever. So explain why on March 10 of this year CArpino said to go to cash that macro lows were coming in..

To: Cheeky Kid who wrote (51434)	9/7/2000 1:50:33 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Respond to of 63513

you should be more skeptical with you sources. Their study is flawed because it did not eliminate outside influences to the study participants. The gravity generated by the moon is probably not interferred with or different than 1000 years ago, but the light that a woman's body is exposed to at night is certainly different. 1000 years ago, it would only have been the moon, now we have artificial lighting. For the study to be valid, it would have to be set up as scientific model that excludes as many of these types of variables as possible.