Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (32177)	9/7/2000 3:24:38 PM
From: Voltaire	Respond to of 35685

Hi CT, Yep, think my $100 by Jan. will be conservative. Cheers, V

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (32177)	9/7/2000 3:33:15 PM
From: Ritch	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35685

Hi CAT! I don't know why anyone would send you "get lost" mail. If people don't want to hear views on a particular stock, they are free to click on the NEXT button. I for one appreciate your insights into QCOM. It is still my largest holding and the upside potential in this stock is a large as ever. I agree with your views on QCOM completely. Keep posting your views! Ritch

To: CAtechTrader who wrote (32177)	9/7/2000 3:41:23 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35685

Thanks CAtech, Always appreciate your posts...... Hope the houses start talking up QCOM again. It's going to take a lot to overcome the constant FUD this year. The houses can do a lot to change or maintain perceptions about QCOM. A few new signed contracts from Asia &/or Europe wouldn't hurt either. I wonder if IJ will have something to talk about on CNBC next Tues? Ö¿Ö Tim