SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : TGL WHAAAAAAAT! Alerts, thoughts, discussion. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Bishop who wrote (62442)9/8/2000 12:38:31 PM
From: StocksDATsoar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 150070
 
ragingbull.altavista.com

By: GL5KWASH $
Reply To: None Friday, 8 Sep 2000 at 11:55 AM EDT
Post # of 3493


Regarding 15-for-1 split...
Many are questioning why a company that's only $1 per share would split 15-for-1, when the objective is to get on NASDAQ, which requires a minimum of $4 per share for 6 months. Is everyone familiar with BIFS ? They had a 100-for-1 split back in April. Unheard of ! The reason was because they had little cash but a great product. So they increased the number of shares in order to use the in acquisitions of other smaller, perhaps struggling, companies. They were able to buy companies with stock, under the assumption that with their great product, the price would rise dramatically. Lest we forget, SSCP is negotiating the purchase of 4 companies ( one, already completed, e-piggybank.com ). Likely, SSCP is going to make their acquisitions largely with stock. So it makes sense to increase the number of shares by 15-to-1, since post-split, they still will have a relatively small number of outstanding shares. In addition, the split will draw others to this stock that would not have even noticed the company had the split only been 2-for-1, 3-for-1, or maybe even 5-for-1. So they'll raise capital, increase stock value, complete acquisitions, grow the business, all with no cash outlay on their part. Very good business.



To: Jim Bishop who wrote (62442)9/8/2000 2:38:54 PM
From: Jim Bishop  Respond to of 150070
 
HVST now they are filling on the bid at .051... weird.