SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Piffer OT - And Other Assorted Nuts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tim Luke who wrote (51706)9/8/2000 12:54:36 PM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
<<MM have scouts>>

I don't agree....I think they use brownies. <g>



To: Tim Luke who wrote (51706)9/8/2000 1:03:22 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 63513
 
Tim,
In this message, I suggested that I wouldn't be surprised to see SAPE rally to 52. It has done just that.
Message 14323616

On this chart you can see why I made this statement:
So, no, I don't think that the MMs did anything based on your call, I think that it was coincident.

74 X * 74
73 X O * 73
72 X O * 72
71 X O * 71
70 --------------------------------------------------------X O ------* ----------------------70 -
69 X O X * 69
68 X O X O * 68
67 ----------------------------------------------------X --X O ----X O ----* ----------------67 -
66 X O X O X X O * 66
65 ----------------------------------------------------X O X O X O X O --------* ------------65 -
64 X O X O X O X O 64
63 X O X O X O O 63
62 X O X O O 62
61 X X O X O Med61
60 ------------------------X ----------* ----------X O X O X --------O ----------------------60 -
59 X O X * X O X O X O 59
58 X O X O * X O X O X O 58
57 X O X X O * X O O X O X 57
56 X O X O X O * X O X O X O 56
55 ------------X ----------X O X --X O X O ------* X ----O X ------* O X O ------------------55 -
54 X O X O X O X O X O X O X * O X O X 54
53 X O X O X O X O O X 7 X O X * O O X O 53
52 X X O 6 O O X O X O X O X 8 X * O X O x 52
51 X O X O X O X O X O X O X * O * O X 9 x 51
50 --------X O X O --------X ----O ------O X O --O X * --* --------------O X O x-------------50 -
49 X O X O X X X O X O * O X O x 49
48 X O X O X O X O X O X * O X O X 48
47 X O X O X O X O X O X * O X O X 47
46 X O O X O X O * O X * O O X 46
45 --* ----X ----O X O X ------------* --O * --------------------------------O X ------------45 -
44 * X O X O X * * O X 44
43 X * X O O X * O 43
42 X O X O X * 42
41 5 O X O X * 41
40 ----X O X --------O ----* ----------------------------------------------------------------40 -
39 X O X * 39
38 O X O X * 38
37 O X O * 37
36 O X * 36
35 - O X --------* --------------------------------------------------------------------------35 -
34 O X * 34
33 O * 33
32 * Bot32
31 * 31



To: Tim Luke who wrote (51706)9/8/2000 1:11:11 PM
From: Lost1  Respond to of 63513
 
slonet.org



To: Tim Luke who wrote (51706)9/8/2000 1:15:44 PM
From: Sarkie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
You've got to be kidding!!
LOL!!



To: Tim Luke who wrote (51706)9/8/2000 1:17:57 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 63513
 
>>tell me im wrong but ......<<

You are wrong.



To: Tim Luke who wrote (51706)9/8/2000 1:33:00 PM
From: arno  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 63513
 
Tim,

I saw your call on SAPE and was watching T&S, and by golly I believe you're right.

Those MM's sure play rough....

~arno