Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Dobbs who wrote (57994)	9/8/2000 6:11:01 PM
From: goldsheet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116753

> inordinate amount of effort trumpeting what you perceive as a supply glut of gold Other folks spend their time discussing the dollar and conspiracy theories, so I need to contribute something else. In the long run it doesn't really matter what I think, only results count, and I have done just fine over the last four years. My inordinate and correct concern over primary mine supply got me out of gold stocks in 1996, kept me out until late 1998, and all my trades since then have resulted in capital gains, no losses. I realize everything here on GPM is just talk, opinions, posturing, etc.. including my posts. I also know my time is usually best spent working on my website or actually trading stocks, but I just can't break the habit of reading GPM, it's addictive. It's also fun watching the goldbugs squirm when their drug of choice (gold) just doesn't give them the high it used to. Now that's entertainment ! P.S. I used to be very bullish on gold and wrote only pro-gold posts from mid-1992 to mid-1993, so please don't think I'm anti-gold. When gold shows me something, I'll be more than willing to change my mind.

To: Bob Dobbs who wrote (57994)	9/8/2000 6:26:32 PM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 116753

IMO the Asian crisis simply moved gold from one set of owners to another, in other words no new supply was created.