Article...THE BLOOD SUCKERS OF....
THE NEW WORLD ORDER OF WELFARE STATES
By: Somerled McNamar
etherzone.com
BLAIR SPEAKING BEFORE THE UN
Recently Anthony Blair of England, Wim Kok of the Netherlands, Goran Persson of Sweden, and Gerhard Schroeder of Germany, while at the United Nations and while safely tucked into the home of liberty dragged before the delegates the tired old vampire of world communism as a fresh concept for the New World Order. They dressed it up in slightly different clothes and polished its fangs hoping no one would notice, but once a blood sucker always a blood sucker. They changed a few of the catch phrases of Marxism, but it’s still the same bad political dogma, a political concept so depressing in it’s fundamental quashing of individual human rights that it defies logic that any modern politician would haul it’s sorry carcass out to be viewed again. Of course the word communism was the first word abandoned since it symbolized the responsibility for killing and crippling most of Europe for almost 85 years. Now it’s posh to call it being Center-Left, and nothing could be further from the truth as liberty loving people understand it.
The vampire stands before the public boldly claiming that; “There’s an emerging consensus on the correct framework to build an global order based on equal worth and social fairness.” This statement begs several questions. Among them, “Who are the quantifiers and definers of the phrases “Equal worth and social fairness?” The speech goes on to say that they want to implement what “they know to be correct,” and being correct means glorifying the new, king-sized, reformulated communism named the Center-Left, and telling folks they are forging a new progressive agenda onto the global stage. How is it these elitist deadheads never learn that utopia is an impossible scheme? if they are so astute and knowledgeable how is it these same politicians couldn’t save a society based on European communism?
These four Marx brothers propound that their new old ideas for Global progress rest on three legs. They say; “First, we need to widen the winners' circle in the new economy. This is socially right but also economically important. Sound macroeconomics policy is necessary but not sufficient. We need active government,” How does one empower winners in the new economy without having government become active in suppressing some citizens to elevate others? Is it the role of American government to yoke its own citizens in its own land to bolster businesses half way around the world? Included within this first leg is education. Education is the key, they cry, but we’ve heard that cry before. Goebbels used it for Hitler, Beria used it for Stalin. Exactly what kind of education is required, or is this another term for brainwashing and propaganda?
“In all our countries education is the top priority for investment. And for those of us brought up under the influence of successful postwar welfare policy, it must be supported by continued modernization of welfare states.” So, every country is to become a Welfare State? Is America a welfare state within their definition? If so, that takes care of ownership of private property doesn’t it? If so, that also takes care of expanded horizons of thought since everything in a welfare state is geared downward to the lowest common denominator and individual effort is an anathema to their system.
“Second, they continue, we need to strengthen civil society. Civil society is a check both against overweening government and untrammeled market power. The underlying values should be clear--a society open and inclusive, but based on responsibilities as well as rights.” Castro strengthened his civil society by enlisting governmental workers in every neighborhood to spy and report on the activities of neighbors who were then severely governmentally chastised or imprisoned.
Further the phrases “overweening government, untrammeled market power, responsibilities, and rights” are dichotomies within the World Order Of Welfare States. In a welfare state you are coddled at the sugar teat from cradle to grave by the government. You have no responsibilities or rights. Everything you do is either State controlled or State sponsored. The Welfare State has all the responsibilities and rights, the individual has none. As for untrammeled market power, I seem to recall, in natural trade, the law of supply & demand apply, so why should a government be entitled to suppress the choice of people to purchase or not to purchase as they see fit?
It is not the American government’s job to sleep in our beds, eat at our tables, count foodstuffs in our pantry, and count toilet tissue in the bathroom. How then should this communist faction strengthen a civil society without depriving folks of liberty?
They continue,”Third, we are committed to a new international social compact.” Translation; We are going to continue to force you by any means necessary to accept the concept of The New World Order Of Welfare States.
“We recognize that in an increasingly interdependent world the aims of wider prosperity and a strengthening of civil society cannot be pursued within the nation-state alone.” This is pure rhetorical hyperbole aimed at making the common man think he’s a victim. What utter trash it is to foist this off on the American people.
“It is that the pursuit of self-interest in one part of the world may be disastrous for another. The key for development is to establish a virtuous circle of debt relief, conflict prevention, trade promotion, educational and health investment, (and) environmental enhancement.” When has any government been virtuous when trampling jack-booted over the liberties of its citizens? Make no bones about it, self interest is floating Wall Street during this Bull Market economy. Also the bottom line of self interest is self defense and self defense is a natural right.
“In relation to debt relief, rich countries have promises to fulfill, while developing countries must show that the poor will benefit.” The United States has sent literally trillions of dollars to other countries to assist them in elevating their status only to find the money stolen and/or misused. We’ve sent not only money but food which met a likewise fate, yet these same citizens who give so warmly and openly are looked upon with disdain when they go abroad. What about the promises of countries seeking debt and debt relief when they apply to the United States for cash. Those promises go unfulfilled as the money ends up in private accounts as personal assets, while the people for which it was intended starve.
In the end we are receiving the same old tired song and dance of failed Marxism. By infiltrating government, brainwashing future generations of American kids to believing the Welfare State is more to be desired than the Constitution with it’s accompanying Bill of Rights, and mandating a New World Order Of Welfare States, the socialists would bring us degradation and chaos. If these people weren’t so serious they’d be laughable. |
