Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SRU-ASE : STARFIELD RESOURCES -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sawdusty who wrote (1066)	9/9/2000 10:23:59 PM
From: Dan P	Respond to of 1239

There is no hype with respect to the tonnage required to make this an economic deposit. We are already at around 20 mill tons, and 40 is regarded as necessary to reach that goal (economic). With this orebody, as has been previously pointed out, the uniform grades and characteristic of the deposit allow rapid increase in tonnage with 100 m stepouts (as opposed to the 50 ft stepouts required for typical gold deposits): so I have been told, by geologists. The consensus is that this 40 mill tons has already been reached, and that the question is how much larger.... The pgm's will pay for the mining, and copper, nickel and cobalt will be "free". Regards Dan

To: Sawdusty who wrote (1066)	9/9/2000 10:43:27 PM
From: winston.s.c	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1239

I think cultured has been around allot longer then august 30,2000.He or she has been posting since last year. A Geologist stating what he believes about a property is hardly material. I don't know how pessimistic or optimistic you have to be right now.The down hole utem and drilling is providing all the evidence needed.Look for yourself.