To: quartersawyer who wrote (2085 ) 9/11/2000 1:41:06 AM From: Maurice Winn Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 12231 Not worrisome to you, but worrisome to a LOT of other people [maybe for no good reason, but they are still worried]. As investors, we need to know whether, when the true body count is in, it will be enough to cause a political or technological or lawsuit problem. The cellular investigations Dr Moulder did was shining radiowaves on cells and assaying them to look for DNA breaks. Unsurprisingly, they didn't find any. But what they should do is irradiate the cells with xrays, which DO cause breaks and then xrays plus radiowaves [giving a total higher energy input] and see if there is an increase in breaks when the radiowave energy is added. That's what is happening in the real world. We have a background of ionizing radiation, then we plug a cellphone into the side of our head to boost the energy by a very tiny amount. That extra energy from 2GHz photons combining with the xrays which give a kick to a particular bond is what matters. Although the extra kick would be microscopically less than the high energy from an xray coming to a halt, it would be like a straw on the camel's back for some number of the bonds. Imagine if all cellphone companies suddenly get statistically-based lawsuits [with people with tumours in their brains able to show that a certain proportion of tumours are in fact caused by cellphones]. Damages could be punitively high if jury-awarded money in the USA is anything to go by. Hot coffee can be worth millions. So imagine what a tumour would be worth - say a family lost a high income father or 4 children lost their mother. Multiply that by how many brain tumours there are and the % blame that cellphones radiation might get...especially if there's any bad or negligent [or cover-up] attitude from the industry. Also, if some tiny risk is shown from cellphones, imagine the boost to sales of low radiation cellphones like CDMA phones. You do yourself an injustice as a sculptor. The greatest value is in the imagination. The rock cutting can be allocated to the science journeymen. Irwin and co invented CDMA. They leave the Silicon carving to Intel and other contractors. I think even Michelangelo eleganza.com had help with the Sistine Chapel citiescommerce.com Maybe not, but I know Reubens had helpers! Investors have to be the great sculptors, understanding all the risks which matter. This one matters to a LOT of people. I'm quite competent in understanding scientific stuff and holding an opinion on it and extending it. I'm right until proven wrong. Sort of like photons are everywhere in all states until proven, by observation, to be right...there... I've given the case. I can't think of anything wrong with it. Neither can you so far [except that you think it's such a stupidly small problem it's not worth wasting time on, which is probably true]. That makes it the extant correct scientific conclusion! Where's the Nobel Prize? Mqurice