SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: EricRR who wrote (109674)9/11/2000 4:45:24 PM
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Eric, Re: I assumed that all P3's were the same design, not that the 1.13GHz chips would be a different die from the rest

Search back for a post by Ali Chen which contains a URL to Intel's technical documentation indicate that 1.13 is indeed from new stepping(c0), and seems to be the only one.

gary



To: EricRR who wrote (109674)9/11/2000 5:17:17 PM
From: Elmer  Respond to of 186894
 
Re: "I assumed that all P3's were the same design, not that the 1.13GHz chips would be a different die from the rest. So why would an Intel person say that the other parts hadn't reached c0 yet?"

Sorry but this makes no sense. There may very well be several steppings in production at any one time but I see no reason why the 1.13GHz would be a unique stepping. The parts that don't make it to 1.133GHz would still be fine for use at lower speeds.

EP


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News