SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nortel Networks (NT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (6783)9/12/2000 12:49:50 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 14638
 
Bosco and Peggylynn will recall a discussion a few weeks back about a comment by Paul Johnson that Nortel's OPTera was "proprietary". We were confused by that comment. Now, it appears that Johnson owns about $9 million of ONIS, a company which is being sued by Nortel for patent infringement and misappropriation of trade secrets.

Analyst Owns $9M in ONI Systems Stock

" Paul Johnson, a managing director of Robertson Stephens, and one of Wall
Street's most respected technology analysts, has made a bundle owning pre-IPO
shares of ONI Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: ONIS). He is listed in the company’s S-1
as having over 100,000 shares of preferred stock.

ONI’s stock has traded well since it debuted in June. Shares were trading today
at around $87, making Johnson’s cut worth about $8.7 million. It's common for
sell-side analysts to own positions in the stocks they cover, but uncommon for
an analyst to own a position that large.

In the past three months since the company has been publicly traded, Johnson
has recommended the stock as a “Buy". The fact that he continues to cover the
company, even though his shares are worth close to $9 million, doesn’t sit well
with other optical networking vendors.

“I’ve known Paul for a long time,” says one optical networking company
spokesperson, who requested anonymity. “I respect his judgment a lot, but for
him to be sitting on a big chunk of stock like that makes me wonder if his
judgment could be affected.”

Johnson says that his objectivity hasn’t been compromised. “I’ve spent 20 years
building my reputation. It’s how I put food on my table,” he says. “I wouldn’t
jeopardize that. Anybody who knows me and has spent any time with me would
say that I am almost objective to a fault.”

He says that he plans to hold onto his ONI shares as a long-term investment and
that he would not sell any shares even if he was set to downgrade the stock,
because "that would be unethical."

He argues further that any overt schemes to keep the stock price up would only
backfire on him: For example, if he tried to bury negative news in an effort to keep
the stock price high, his competitors would be more than happy to break the
news instead.

And, he contends, if he comes out overly bullish on the stock while his
competitors take a more realistic stance, the market would probably ignore his
recommendations and his reputation would end up suffering too.

Johnson says he invested in the company back in 1998 long before its IPO and
at the time he had no expectation of it ever doing well. “Some old friends had
asked me to invest. I thought they were crazy at first, but they’re smart guys. So,
I made a private investment.”

“At the time, I was just trying to help out some old friends,” he says. “I wasn’t
thinking, ‘Geez, this is going to make me rich.’ If I had known that it was going to
turn into such a big investment, I probably would have passed on the opportunity
—- just because of questions like this. What can I do now? I can’t really give the
shares back.”

Johnson isn't the only person who has done well out of ONI. Matt Bross, chief
technology officer for Williams Communications, an ONI customer, also profited
from the IPO (see Williams' CTO Profits From His Position ). His shares are now
worth almost $30 million.

-- Marguerite Reardon, senior editor, Light Reading, lightreading.com

lightreading.com



To: rrufff who wrote (6783)9/13/2000 9:19:13 PM
From: jack bittner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14638
 
large blocks have been selling every day for 10 days now.
on a scale of 1 (heaviest block selling) to 5 (heaviest block buying), nt has gone from a 4 to a 2 in a week. as to non-block, nt has been a 2 for over a month. what do those institutions know that we don't? on several down days nortel has gone from its recent average of about 7 million shares a day - and a year's average of 9-10 million a day - to 15 million in a day. maybe nt is planning a huge dilutive acquisition. i dunno.