Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Sungold Gaming International (SGGNF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Archangel who wrote (4967)	9/13/2000 11:02:41 AM
From: Troy Griffin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5164

If your referring to the meeting with Richmond town council, the official date is Sept 25. As for the stock price I think it is being severely manipulated and held down by certain individuals as well as people are not interested in fantasy wagering they want cash betting, but the way Sungold is rolling out Horsepower is the correct way maybe not the most sexy way and it will take some time to catch on but by late fall when it goes live wagering you will see more interest in the stock. I have said it before and I'll say it again, as soon as the Sungold bashers start to show up, and they have, you know they are nervous that we might actually get a yes vote for the track, and Horsepower might very well succeed. We have not heard any news since July 20th. Only negative postings from idiots who have nothing but bad intensions for our company, unfortunately this is the only media we are getting. Here is the equation Impatience+no news+shareholders (who are easily swayed) influenced by crap posted on chat sites+projects that are taking a long time to impliment+market makers screwing with the stock e.g. high volume days and the stock does not move=.281 cent stock price I hope this thing turns around soon just like the rest of us, but saying stuff like Archangel just did out of self pity does nothing good whatsoever, period end of story No need to reply

To: Archangel who wrote (4967)	9/13/2000 4:54:27 PM
From: Rogue Warrior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5164

I agree and I wasn't going to post again. May we all stick with issues rather than the personal attacks for those painting a picture as it is - not what we'd like it to be. The longer this hangs out in the breeze, the greater the risk - like in I-Net gambling. That's going to go - big time. Unfortunately, I doubt SGGNF is going to be leaving the station with the 'Vegas heavy hitters. They have the casinos and the cash (read reputation). Now Richmond - great project but I don't read anything better than last year (pardon me - most of the Council knows about it this application). I repeat - I know of no heavy support in Council for SGGNF. I do have an inkling of the vicious opposition from the power in the former VSE. They don't know the new Board from a hole in the ground (other than their significant signifcant successes in other fields). They have great animosity towards SGGNF that borders on the pathological. I have no idea why but only KH remains from the original Board. If there's a connection, I don't know and I'd rather stick with issues rather than people I really don't know. Be aware, though, that these same folks living just miles from Richmond will have not gone away. Richmond is a major hurdle - if it fails, I doubt HP will mean much. As for Toledo Beach, the local officials seem not to know much about it (shades of Richmond a year or so ago). Finally, the brokerage community in Canada is not positive on SGGNF (understatement) and the US exposure should have done something. It didn't and that despite the talk shows and incentives to the Florida firm (as I recall). Oh that this thing/mess would resolve positively in favor of SGGNF/shareholders!!! Believe what you will - Archangel and Cheeky are presenting you with fact. I suppose how you interpret that is your perspective - that will also be your reality. Rose colored glasses or harsh light of day. Again, whichever way it goes, may we all move on much wiser, at a minimum. We have apparently lost a number of the original group - remember them well - let's not drive away the rest - from posting. I wish us ALL well!!! PS: Let's not make this a Bre-X 2 situation - we're all in the same leaky boat and most of us will share the same fate - whichever way. R.W.