Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waverider who wrote (80179)	9/13/2000 10:56:29 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Diamond even when I didnt own the stock I didnt try to talk it down. I didnt post from 138-105 because I didnt want a conflict of interest. I believe Jacob is being negative out of desire for a lower stock price. Your motives were genuine, though incorrect.

To: waverider who wrote (80179)	9/13/2000 10:19:27 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

Hello DH, >>Mike, what's the deal? I mean even during the time you said I destroyed the thread, you didn't go after me as much as you have been dogging Jacob. There are games, and there are low games. This fellow has been in apparently tries to bring down his cost by trading, which is fair enough, but when he gets caught out of the stock and the stock moves, he then posts crap like he does, minimizing the importance of huge events for the company, with the hopes shoppers and new comers to the stock will get scared away. If you think what's written up on this web site does not have even a small impact on the price of a stock, I beg to differ. Now, this fellow has stooped to this tactic in several occasions, you will remember. You may say well, people do that all over the place, on all boards, and you would be correct. But that does not make me and I guess marginmike any less pissed. Regards, Sam A.