Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (59255)	9/13/2000 2:43:57 PM
From: Mama Bear	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Thanks for your thoughts wrt EDIG. I don't trade OTC stocks as a personal rule, but perhaps others may be so inclined. "Manipulation on the level I've witnessed in the virtual should be illegal also!" You wouldn't be trying to suggest that disagreeing with you about EDIG's prospects is 'manipulation', would you? How in the world would you ever buy a stock unless someone disagreed with you? Regards, Barb

To: PartyTime who wrote (59255)	9/13/2000 6:48:52 PM
From: Jesse Livermore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Party Time, except for missing on the # of shares by 4 million out of 130 million, the content of my post was accurate. 126 or 130 million shares the difference is inconsequential Lanier contract division is sold or being sold and it is edig's only revenue producer that I know about and is not a definite renewal. When you have an operating system you compete with MSFT. It was a great short at $7! Selling a stock is as risky as buying a stock. You don't comment on the most important short item: CFO and CEO selling hundreds of thousands of shares before listing. Good luck with EDIG. I still think the shorts will shred you once you list and it is easier to short.