Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (6140)	9/13/2000 4:39:30 PM
From: Uncle Frank	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22706

>> the double post was redundant. It's hard to think of a case where a double post wouldn't be redundant. Good job in living up to the thread charter. cuf@theobviousisn'talwaysobvious.com

To: unclewest who wrote (6140)	9/13/2000 4:45:14 PM
From: Eric L	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22706

cUW, << should we short Q here? >> Sounds like you're a player. Ask Yogi. - ce -

To: unclewest who wrote (6140)	9/13/2000 4:54:44 PM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22706

Did I get that right? Did Mr. Verbosity himself call YOU redundant? Maybe you should remove his larynx with a credit card. I think that your RMBS buy was a great move. I think that tekboy should buy it back again. I'd hate to see his self-reproaching pitiful posts when RMBS hits 200. If anyone questioned the need for an SI addiction thread, it was validated with the several blank and near-blank posts. They had nothing to say but just couldn't stand not posting. Kind of like being out of dope and smoking oregano (sandwedge told me about that). Dr.Id@unclewestspeaksthetruthaboutRMBS.com