To: Paul Senior who wrote (11163 ) 9/14/2000 12:39:41 PM From: Daniel Chisholm Respond to of 78497 Paul, please start contributing again, at least for my sake (!). I do recall seeing accusations leveled here which accused the 'regulars' here of being a bit too clubby. While there was a faint element of truth to it (after all, each thread has its own 'atmosphere', the result of the blending of the personalities of the 'regulars'), I did not and do not feel that it was a "closed" thread in any manner (and this is in spite of the fact that I personally took some shellacking over my suggestion of certain "value-based shorts"). About the worst I think the thread could be honestly accused of being is just the *tiniest* (and I do mean *tiniest*) bit too orthodox (by this I suppose I mean "too strictly Grahamian"). Provided that a newcomer approached the thread with an open honest desire to learn and the most minimal amount of deference, I think the thread has been pretty open and accepting (though I suppose it has perhaps done more ignoring of good ideas than it should have done, as Paul has illustrated). As a very regular reader (but fairly infrequent contributor) here, I suppose I am at as much fault as anybody in letting the quality and diversity of discourse here slip. When a seasoned regular (e.g. Paul Senior), or even more importantly a totally new poster, puts forth a seemingly sound stock idea for consideration, and I and others don't do our own independent research into it, following up to the thread with either an affirmation of the original idea or a well-researched critique of its weaknesses, then I suppose we are letting the thread down. Of course it's neither necessary nor desirable to do this with every idea here, but unless "semi-lurkers" such as myself keep the thread's idea mill churning at critical mass (either by putting forth new ideas ourselves, or giving some of the ideas of the more regular posters some good stress checks), then this thread'll go to sleep and die. And that would truly be a horrible thing. - Daniel