Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Kosovo -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (17054)	9/15/2000 6:14:53 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17770

Frankly, I don't feel upset by the prospect of such a heavyhanded censorship.... After all, it's just the extension of the state's force monopoly into cyberspace. Remember back in 1992, after the LA riots, the local authorities enforced a curfew upon the city. Actually, I'm much more concerned about a stealth, selective censorship of maverick opinions/news. For instance, the recent lawsuit against Yahoo! in France is a blatant infringement of free speech. Oh sure, it's shocking to learn that Yahoo!'s French portal offers an access to a cybershop for amateurs/buyers of Nazi gizmos and WWII gear.... So we've got a prominent anti-racist French NGO (MRAX?) launching a dramatic campaign against yet another Yank outfit that is sullying France's cyberlandscape with Nazi propaganda --fine! However, the problem with that kind of moral censorship is that although we all know where and when it's started, we never know where and when it'll stop. And, as a far-left nut myself, I know what I'm talking about! Belgium had a similar precedent a few months back: a judicial police officer with far-right leanings used to display his racist trash over the internet. Obviously the guy got sued by Belgium's Comité pour l'égalité des chances and a Belgian court sentenced him to a $2,500(?) fine and a reprimand or something... Again, I cannot but be pleased with the outcome of that "cybercrackdown" against Neo-nazis and other far-rightist loonies. However, hindsight tells me that Europe's bourgeoisie has always felt more threatened by another ideological foe --the far-left and the anarchist crowd. Obviously, at this point, it'd be quite premature and very un-PC for any European establishment to run down on the "cyberleft" head-on. Hence the swing-by tactics that consists of exposing the far-right bugbear first and, building up on a favorable momentum, deflecting public opprobrium towards the leftist fringe, in the second stage. Gus.