Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (29821)	9/15/2000 6:36:21 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42787

Interestingly that this certified idiot on metamarkets, does not see any "panic" buying in certain US tech equities. As to oil prices for a long time I was posting on SI that crude oil around $32-$34 is in line with inflation. 1998/99 was a aberration. The writer on this site seems to agree with me on this issue contraryinvestor.com DMP is one thing to trade swings it is another issue to twist fundamentals and the truth. Oh well typical arrogance of Americans ........ Haim

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (29821)	9/15/2000 7:54:18 AM
From: donald sew	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 42787

Dennis, >>>> A Good Read for All: community.metamarkets.com. <<<<< I took a look at his analysis, and frankly I only give him a fair rating. He failed to mention the numerous DOUBLE TOPs which just formed and with his own charts he failed to highlight that many of the trendlines that he himself drew were broken to the downside, although slightly. A slight break of a trendline is not concrete since it could just be an overshoot, but to ignore it/not highlight it as a possibility of a change - I question that type of analysis. Remeber these are his own trendlines that he drew not mine. Im just analysing his analysis. Hes not lousey nor is he great. Ive seen better and Ive seen worse. Basicly he is ignoring or not highlight the subtle issues. Sorry, but I would not consider it a good read. I wont ignore what he is saying since I do agree with some of it, but he is leaving out a bit. To me it is an incomplete analysis. Do you remember what happened to the last analysis which I felt was incomplete and ignored many factors. Please dont take as a put-down of ones opinion, but as a critique on ones analysis in terms of being complete and objective, regardless if the opinion is right. An incomplete/non-objective analysis can still be right.