Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ken Benes who wrote (58186)	9/15/2000 10:03:05 AM
From: Enigma	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116762

So short ABX, short PDG, and cover at 12 and 6 and then you will have something to tell us. But that would mean putting money where your mouth is. The fault dear Ken lies not in the the stars but in ourselves that we are underlings. And, to put it bluntly, investors, and shareholders simply don't agree with you. Have you ever considered that gold is actually being supported at this price? Extending your whacky logic - this might be a conclusion to be made? Why is the conspiracy only on the one side after all? What's keeping it from going lower? See, I couldn't help myself - you must be lonely in the sandbox with just Doug to play with?

To: Ken Benes who wrote (58186)	9/15/2000 6:11:56 PM
From: d:oug	Respond to of 116762

Ken, People in the business that monitors Good versus Evil know from day 1, just as 1+1=2, while it can be very hard for one to create something, it is very easy for another to destroy what was created, person place or thing. Good people create good things. Bad people destroy good things created by good people. Sometimes good people help the bad people, sometimes to destroy the good made by others, sometimes to destroy their own product. Example aTime we have here, very very close to "home" in the gold producers and shareholders. Lets identify who is the WGC, not the mouthpiece folks or even so much the words but where the words came form which producers and the why as in "for what reason" for it might be "to destroy" with end result they only end up with "more" while the other lose all. Put your words into action and facts Ken. Benes at Sep 15, 2000 To me, the complicity of the producers in the manipulation of the gold price, has been obvious for several years. Investors have finally caught on, and as *** said in a recent post, there is little incentive for him to take new positions in any of the producers. ... Until the producers are driven into the ground they will continue to represent interests other than the shareholder. So Ken, rather than take this approach, as destroyer, lets create a "good" results thing. Lets identify as I mentioned above, those producers responsible for the message and facts reported by the WGC for the public to use to buy/hold/sell gold producing companies and related physical gold interests. as follows my past post for reference. As posted, the World Gold Council is made up of gold producers, and the WGC message is now "gold sucks now & forever". The following, fro Every gold producer in the World Gold Council should be apprised of this by gold shareholders and gold investors around the world. GATA urges all of you to contact them and make them aware of what GATA and Reg Howe have uncovered and that the BIS has confirmed GATA's basic premise. The gold producers should all be informed of what is going on, who is perpetuating the collusion and why. We all know how these things work in the end. Scalps and irresponsible industry executives will be sought out. Lawsuits, lawsuits, and more lawsuits. Shareholders all over the world, especially those who sold out or lost money, will want to know what the gold producer executives did about the obvious fraud when they were reasonably informed. Did they support GATA's efforts? Did gold producer members of the World Gold Council take responsible action to correct the fallacies in the Cross/WGC report, which conceal the bullishness of the gold market? Did they take any action in behalf of their shareholders to get the truth out? The continued support of the World Gold Council by gold mining companies might be more dangerous to the companies than their openly supporting GATA. Then, at least, they would have a defense about what they tried to do when presented with the facts. GATA is doing