SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: kapkan4u who wrote (8702)9/15/2000 1:40:33 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 275872
 
Kap, alright, I'll accept that AMD doesn't really need an SSE or SSE2 license to duplicate the instruction set, although marketing it could get tricky. Do you know if SSE2 has been fully disclosed, or will we have to wait for P4 release?

Petz



To: kapkan4u who wrote (8702)9/15/2000 3:52:44 PM
From: TechieGuy-altRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Actually that's not true. From what I remember (and understand), an arbitration judge awarded AMD a perpetual and royalty free license to AMD for Intel's x86/x87 code for some of Intel's "shennenagins" in the mid to late 80's.

TG

I don't think that AMD has a license to
SSE/SSE-2 or x86/x87 instructions for that matter.



To: kapkan4u who wrote (8702)9/16/2000 1:28:55 AM
From: Paul EngelRespond to of 275872
 
Re: "AMD bought a license for MMX, but they did it before Intel made the MMX instructions public. After signing with AMD, Intel released MMX instructions few days later to the public. This was just another illustration of Intel's unscrupulous nature."

Just when did Intel release the MMX instructions publicly ?