Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rarebird who wrote (678)	9/16/2000 11:17:09 AM
From: long-gone	Respond to of 10042

Yes, the future of the 2nd amendment & our rights to protect ourselves from those who would do us harm(both animal & human) & the right to feed ourselves through hunting will fall to the Supreme Court & those appointed by the next President.

To: Rarebird who wrote (678)	9/17/2000 4:43:29 PM
From: ColtonGang	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10042

The latest update..........http://www.siliconinvestor.com/msg_reply.gsp?msgid=14399490

To: Rarebird who wrote (678)	9/18/2000 7:30:21 AM
From: long-gone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10042

ELECTION 2000 GOP senators slam Gore's spending plan Claim VP's proposals would devour federal budget surplus -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Editor's note: In collaboration with the hard-hitting Washington, D.C., newsweekly Human Events, WorldNetDaily brings you this special report every Monday. Readers can subscribe to Human Events through WND's on-line store. By Timothy P. Carney © 2000, Human Events Calling Al Gore's spending plans "expansive, expensive and risky," Senate Budget Committee Chairman Pete Domenici, R-N.M., told reporters that the Democratic presidential candidate would add $2.6 to $3.4 trillion in new discretionary spending over the next decade, thus possibly exceeding the projected $3.3-trillion on-budget surplus. "The vice president's numerous spending proposals would devour, as we figure it, every dime of the federal budget surplus," Domenici said. Held two weeks ago, the press conference, which Domenici denied was intended to aid the election prospects of George W. Bush, accompanied the release of a 51-page Senate Budget Committee report on Gore's proposals. Amid their assaults on Gore's "unprecedented burst of new spending," Republican leaders admitted that they also intend to increase the size of the federal government and hike spending, but by lower amounts, if the party has control of the White House and both houses next year. "We can't expect real cuts, if that's what you're looking for," Domenici told Human Events. Domenici, Sen. Phil Gramm, R-Texas, and Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tenn., defended the current budget-cap-busting in Congress as well as George W. Bush's proposed education spending hikes. "We're not going to fight over an anthill," said Gramm, referring to the amount of this year's overspending compared with Gore's budget, "when we've got a mountain about to avalanche on our heads." (cont) worldnetdaily.com