Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (80510)	9/16/2000 7:35:11 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

Jacob, yes, you are right - sorry got 17th and 18th messed up. The one that starts with 17 is the 18th century. The one that starts with 18 was the 19th and the one with 19 was the 20th century and that was the last one. Same as the next millennium starts next year. Easy to mess up. But that's just semantics. Now you've confused the forest with the trees and lost the point! I meant 1790 or thereabouts. What's 100 years out of a million anyway? You want to count seconds too? That's my point...it was a long haul through the DNA world but now DNA is about to disappear! But me confusing the centuries won't change The New Paradigm. You obviously know much, much more about what used to be than me [or, to use the grammatically correct prepositional subjunctive, I]. But the past has gone. What matters is where we are going. It's tough to drive a fast car on a windy road looking in the rear view mirror. Anyway, all that French Revolution stuff is available right here if we need it...just click SEARCH and It will tell me 1000 times as much as you know. Okay, it was broad swords or something they used to chop people up. Here's one source if you want more detail: fordham.edu A schedule for the fun and games here: warwick.ac.uk See how much It knows already?!! Amazing and It's still just a zygote. Wait until It's a teenager and then you'll be truly impressed. The details don't matter Jacob. The broad pattern doesn't depend on how many stitches Madame Whatsit put in her knitting. It's does depend on how many phragmented photons Monsieur Perry LaFarge and the CDG can stitch into a wave function. Try re-reading the original. What's coming will affect your life a lot more than axes in the 18th century [or 19th]and you can do something about it. You can't change the French Revolution. It doesn't worry me that I don't know much and that a lot of what I do know isn't true. There is still enough left to be going on with - keeps me busy and body and soul together. That's probably true for you too! Mqurice