Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (110114)	9/17/2000 12:45:33 AM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 186894

Re: Only 6 and later 7 are truly viable. One we do not seem to like and the other is not here yet. Here is hoping for 7 Great post (if utterly off topic, but hey, it's Saturday). When they drained the sodium from EBR-II at INEL I think the only hope for the next 25 years was drained away with it. Regards, Dan

To: pgerassi who wrote (110114)	9/17/2000 1:38:39 AM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 186894

Pete, I've been watching the R&D efforts for fusion power since I was in high school in Los Alamos in the 70's. People took this very seriously back then. It is too bad that momentum for alternative energy research was killed in the 80's. BTW: The most energy ever generated in modern Los Alamos was during the Cerro Grande fire in May. This of course pales by comparison to the eruption of the Jemez caldera a million years ago, which spread volcanic ash as far away as Nebraska. Scumbria