SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MRV Communications (MRVC) opinions? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bridge Player who wrote (24007)9/18/2000 8:49:55 AM
From: Sector Investor  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42804
 
I'm not concerned with short term movements (other than to
buy/sell trading shares)

Here is a bit more research extending my Aranea/Pluris post
from last night. I just looked at port densities so far.

I added the JNPR top of the line M160 port densities for
comparison with Aranea. The M160 also fits 2 per rack, so
the numbers for Aranea and JNPR are doubled for a rack
comparison. The densities are for a maxed out box at OC192
"OR" OC48 "OR" GE, etc.

Description CWNT Aranea Pluris JNPR M160

# OC192 ports 32 15 16
# OC48 ports 128 60 64
# OC12 ports 256 60 (240 future) None
# GE ports 256 60 (120 future) None
Route tbl ents 1 Million ? ?
IP subnets 256K ? ?
Packet 384Mpps ? 160 Mpps
forwarding (per box)

Clustering
Box-box "geographically 100 meters Not
Connectivity remote" Applicable

Aggregate 320Gbps 150Gbps 320Gbps
interface
bandwidth