Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kvkkc1 who wrote (37688)	9/18/2000 9:09:41 AM
From: donjuan_demarco	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Well, we can go back and forth on this forever, so this will be my last post on the subject (we could always start a new board on the subject). The point I am making, and which hasn't been addressed, is: "Why shouldn't we just trust the jury to make the proper decision regarding damages?" After all, we allow juries to decide whether convicted criminals should live or die. If we can trust a jury with that decision, why shouldn't we trust them to make an appropriate award of damages?