Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (53859)	9/18/2000 4:14:45 PM
From: Dave B	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

GV, Could you please try and spin that? I'm so used to reading spin on this thread that it is difficult to read anything straightforward. LOL! Definitely a lot of people hate and love this company. There's little rationality left in between. <G> How about: "You'd have to be a buffoon to sell or short this stock thinking that NEC/Hitachi won't sign!!!!! Infineon, Micron, Samsung, Mitsubishi, Ford, GE, and Telefonica Italia will all sign licenses by the end of the year or the 'bus will put 'em out of business!!!!!! We'll be at $500 by the end of the year and I'm loading up right now!!!!!!!!" Or: "RDRAM is dead, dead, dead, and NEC/Hitachi will never, never, never sign a deal to license SDRAM/DDR, SDRAM/DDR, SDRAM/DDR. This pig is going to $3 by the end of the month, I predict!!!!!! What a bunch of LOSERS!!!!! Semico has said we'll see PC1000000 DDR by the beginning of 2002, and that'll blow away the Microsoft Word and Excel benchmarks running on a PC800 RDRAM system by miles!!!!!! Also, AMD will be larger than Intel by 2004, if not sooner!!!!!!" God, that was fun!!!!!!! I'll have to write these more often!!!!!! And it sure makes it sound more true when you use lots of exclamation points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [Note: I once had a graphic designer tell me that marketing people sprinkle exclamation points on their cereal for breakfast. <G>] Is that clearer? VVVVVBG Dave