Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wlheatmoon who wrote (2838)	9/18/2000 4:33:04 PM
From: bill meehan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

If you mean from Friday night, it was basically that the reason for owning QCOM had little to do with Korea or near-term prospects of business in China, but rather the company's technology and patents. Of course, it was outrageously overvalued during the height of the mania, although still not "cheap". It also looks good technically in the near-term for traders.

To: wlheatmoon who wrote (2838)	10/19/2000 12:26:17 AM
From: Terry Whitman	Respond to of 33421

Update on my story stock, HURC. High volume capitulation spike yesterday, and NO volume today. The sellers have apparently dried up, and the forecast for November is - >Under the settlement, judgment has been entered in favor of IMS finding all of the claims of the Patent enforceable. IMS has licensed the Patent to Haas and Haas will make a substantial one-time payment to IMS, which is expected to be included in the Company's results for its fourth fiscal quarter ending October 31, 2000. < Not a recommendation to buy or sell, but I'm a buyer on the first sign of interest. Any good stories 4 me? <g>