Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (53940)	9/18/2000 8:20:35 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93625

My friend, in the court, it not what you said that count, (that is called "hearsay", I believe) it is what you did, and the fact of the matter is that they signed the dotted line. They can argue until they are blue in the face that they signed the Agreement because of the future merger of their Dram operations with those of NEC, a corporate signature on a licensing agreement is at least a partial recognition of the validity of the underlying IP. Since to operate as a new entity, the new company will have to have access to IP generated, licensed or cross licensed by the parent, it would be a walk in the park for Rambus to show, that their IP should get the treatment as other IP involved, and thus, prior Agreements signed by *both* of its antecedents corporate bodies, surely will inure on the successor Zeev