SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: chic_hearne who wrote (53947)9/18/2000 8:34:08 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
chic, I have signed quite a number of licensing agreements, i have never had a single one in which there was a clause, "hey, but we think that the patent are invalid", sure there are clauses stating that royalties rate may change if the basic patents are invalidated . Since Rambus always provide support to its licensees, there is always an element of "proprietary information" which is not patented, but still could bear royalties, that is probably covered by the license,.. If the license is worded correctly, the licensee is forbidden from challenging the validity of the IP at a later date. I think that you are holding your argument by straws here, the basic facts is that the Dramurais are folding..., the poker game is nearly over.

Good luck out there, we'll need it in the next two days.

Zeev



To: chic_hearne who wrote (53947)9/18/2000 8:53:08 PM
From: capt rocky 1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
chic,where in the hell did you reads that toshiba, oki, hitachi and nec signed deals stating that they thought rmbs patents were invalid but they would pay them anyway? that goes beyond lying to STUPID LYING. and if any one else thinks nec and hitachi can change their minds and not recognise rmbs patents after they once recognised them can chip in for the lawsuit. by the way, john elway is getting a part in the o.j. simpson movie. he plays the part of the slow white bronco! rocky



To: chic_hearne who wrote (53947)9/18/2000 8:56:46 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 93625
 
chic,
You are incorrect. Only Hitachi made the comment. Not Toshiba, not Oki and not NEC. If you know otherwise, please prove me wrong with a link.