To: Tom Clarke who wrote (17066 ) 9/19/2000 9:51:13 AM From: GUSTAVE JAEGER Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 17770 An interesting article indeed.... Keep in mind though that, at the time, we were deep in the thick of the Cold War and Europe per se didn't mean anything --you were either dealing with Western Europe or Eastern Europe. Furthermore, in the aftermath of WWII, Communist parties were very popular throughout Western Europe --hence the so-called strategy of tension implemented by the CIA and its European liege outfits. I think that the building of a unified European community was viewed as a valuable ideological challenger to the Communist Utopia. Americans, together with Europe's clerico-fascists and other right-wing lobbies (e.g. Gladio) devised the European thrust as a grandiose raison d'être held out to the peoples of Europe. Up to 1989, such a common endeavour worked all right: the EEC thrived and expanded on an anti-Soviet/Communist basis, as the junior partner of that great Western Alliance.... So, subservient issues such as libertarian economics, America's cultural hegemon (Hollywood, etc.), multiracialism, corporate governance à la Yankee, unfettered immigration and other sensitive topics had to be left on the "back burner" because on each of the aforenamed issues there was a deep mismatch between the US worldview and (Western) Europe's. Hence, the best strategy for the western mouthpieces was to make Europe ape Uncle Sam so as to take a united stand against Uncle Joe (ie USSR). And accordingly, Europe's been showed off as a paragon of democracy, a liberal, equal-opportunity society, a meritocratic labor market, and an altogether early-adopter-minded business activity. And the snag is, Europe is none of that --hence the current backlash.... Gus.