Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (110275)	9/19/2000 12:01:04 PM
From: willcousa	Respond to of 186894

But Gore is not proposing modest adjusting of the economy. He is proposing spending all the surplus plus 1 trillion more and taking over the health care system. Thus I prefer Bush.

To: Ali Chen who wrote (110275)	9/19/2000 1:12:28 PM
From: hmaly	Respond to of 186894

Ali Re..In contrast, for Reps to win, they need to promise something radically different, and, if win, have to follow their promises. Surely you jest. Nobody in politics nowadays keeps their promises. They promise one thing and do another based on who pays them the most. Why would the republicans have to follow their promises more than the dems follow theirs? <This may lead the system to go out of balance and collapse. I don't like this perspective, and therefore prefer Gore. Who brainwashed you. Alan Greenspan is running the economy, and he will have his job no matter who is elected. The simple fact is that the republicans and dems. are fighting so much, nothing is getting done; and until the intra-party infighting stops, nothing will. And until we get the money out of Washington, we will never have representative government.