Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (110330)	9/19/2000 3:36:48 PM
From: Bob Kim	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

GVTucker, Fiduciary duty isn't a necessary factor. There are public communications regulations. Most brokerages protect themselves behind hedge clauses, but even the regs say that those don't offer protection from anti-fraud provisions.

To: GVTucker who wrote (110330)	9/19/2000 3:43:39 PM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

Duke, RE: I think that once information IS disclosed then 17B comes into play and the duty to disclose hidden motives, if any. There is no duty, nor should there be. I'm sorry if I we miscommunicated. There IS a duty not to intentionally attempt to manipulate the price of any stock using untrue information for any hidden purpose resulting in attempted gain and that duty is owed to all who own that stock and to all who are potential purchasers of that stock.