Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (54068)	9/19/2000 4:05:44 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

Scumbria, Come on. You can do better than that. Those numbers are not latency specific and there are many benchmarks out there between PC133 and RDRAM that show exactly the opposite. That by however small or large margin, RDRAM is faster than SDRAM. However, this is not what I'm asking. DRAMreview makes a good case on why overall average RDRAM latency is better than SDRAM. Since you guys always bring latency up, you should be able to disprove their technical data with latency tests and technical data of your own that shows the opposite. That with more transaction requests, SDRAM has a latency advantage over RDRAM (by the way, high end CAD/graphics benchmarks have shown RDRAM being faster than PC133 by about 10% - even while RDRAM is being handicapped by a PC133 balanced FSB). So someone should be able to disprove dramreview's data. Well?