Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: teevee who wrote (6263)	9/20/2000 2:40:14 AM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Teevee Heading out of town for a day or two but HB informed me this morning that the claims I referred to are GGL's. SUF's shares similarly disputed claims surrounding the ones reported on and if I recall the message correctly, a separate action is being pursued on them. HB did not give me the status of the resolution of their disputed claims. For some reason I was under the impression that they were all being dealt with at the same time, but I was apparently mistaken. If memory serves me the GGL web site used to show these claims on a map which I believe lie along the southern border of MPV's Kenady Lake claims and are within a stones throw of their pipe cluster. I don't believe a great deal of work has been done on them since the dispute arose some number of years ago but again if memory serves, there were apparent trains sourced from them. gerle.com Regards

To: teevee who wrote (6263)	9/27/2000 2:27:54 AM
From: VAUGHN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Teevee This on the wire today. I wonder if the decision will now help speed up settlement of SUF's litigation on the claims next door? FOR: GGL DIAMOND CORP. CDNX SYMBOL: GGL SEPTEMBER 26, 2000 - 13:40 EDT GGL Diamond: Section 84 Judicial Review, Doyle Lake Property Claims - LA 26 - 30, Easy 1 - 3 VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA--GGL Diamond Corp. is pleased to report that the Federal Court of Appeal has set aside the decision of the Assistant Deputy Minister ("ADM") of Indian Affairs and Northern Development of November 20, 1997, where the ADM overturned the May 10, 1996 decision of the Supervising Mining Recorder. The Federal Court has remitted the matter to the Minister for a redetermination de novo in accordance with the reasons for judgement of the court at a date to be set. GGL DIAMOND CORP. J. Haig deB. Farris, Director Regards