SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rudedog who wrote (35602)9/20/2000 10:08:28 AM
From: alydar  Respond to of 64865
 
Hi Rudedog,

Interactive TV (i.e., WebTV) has been in the market for years. Until someone gets it right it is not disruptive but it will change the way we communicate someday. To me, that is disruptive.

Bob.



To: rudedog who wrote (35602)9/20/2000 11:23:17 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 64865
 
Rudedog, forget about all the useless chatter on this board insiders think the company stock is way overvalued at those levels during one week insider sold over $120 million worth of SUNW shares.

biz.yahoo.com

This does not count for September sales as they are not reported yet.

If insiders sell at such a frenzy why holding on to the full position??? SUNW insiders also pay capital gain taxes.

IMHO SUNW has peaked from a price perspective and the latest acquisition of CBOLT only proves that SUNW management think they have a way over valued currency.

As to CBOLT losses they are marginal for SUNW substracting insider profit on the sales of their option eliminates SUNW earnings growth. Insider sell stock at a $400 million pace each quarter. In proper accounting and accurate cost of labor reporting SUNW earned only half of what was formally reported.

It is called monetizing investors ignorance, and the brokerage houses executing those insiders sales of shares came back recommending the stock.

The stock is a MOMO stock and many do not realize it.

No response needed

Thank you

Haim



To: rudedog who wrote (35602)9/20/2000 2:31:07 PM
From: JC Jaros  Respond to of 64865
 
Automobiles were around for a few years before Ford made it a disruptive technology. PCs were around for a few years before Gates made that a disruptive technology. It wasn't the PC / Buggy makers (or the buggy PC makers) that made the Automobile the rage. -JCJ