SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (54223)9/20/2000 10:14:35 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria,
Empirical data??? You have yet to post any specific data that disproves the dramreview technical data that RDRAM has better overall average latency than SDRAM.

I will make the question very simple. Does RDRAM have better latency than SDRAM when there are more than two transactions waiting to be serviced? Yes or no? If you say no, you better have a link to some good technical data to back it up. If you say yes, then you will also agree that that gives RDRAM a better overall average latency as shown in the graph.

As I've already posted before, current benchmarks do not do justice or measure the high bandwidth multithreaded multitasking net aware applications of today. Current benchmarks today are old (most of them were written during the single app DOS days) and measure old world apps. The world has moved on. I also see you didn't say anything about the benchmark links I posted.



To: Scumbria who wrote (54223)9/20/2000 10:19:10 AM
From: gnuman  Respond to of 93625
 
More P4 benchmarks?
The Reg has a link to more P4 BM's.
theregister.co.uk
The P4 benchmarks I've seen to date can't be representative of actual P4 performance. For those P4 benchmarks common to Intel's published PIII/i820 and PIII/i815, P4 loses to both.
I'll wait for Intel's official BM's
JMHO's