SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The *NEW* Frank Coluccio Technology Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (869)9/22/2000 10:47:38 AM
From: justone  Respond to of 46821
 
Frank:

Regarding cable upstream traffic capabilities and prioritization schemes for voice.

I've looked a bit into cable modems, and found that some of the vender's information easier to read than
the www.packetcable.com (from www.cablelabs.com). Ciscos' product paper is very instructive, since
it gives DOCSIS 1.0 (broadband data cable modem), and then described the new functions expected for
QoS and voice and fax in DOCSIS 1.1.

ieng.com

I've reproduced some relevant sections from this document below the ... line.

My conclusion is that the managed IP link between the home cable termination device and the head end
was designed to support a non contention based voice priority communication in DOCSIS 1.1. Traffic
engineering of the upstream then can be used to evaluate the likelihood of blocking of voice, and the
amount of bandwidth available for data.

Still, we need to know what compression algorithm will be used, will IPv6 be used, will RTP be used or
compressed RTP, what it the voice compression algorithm. Making a wild guess, if you get a 4:1
compression (which I'm not sure about), and have say, 16 Kbps per voice channel required. Now
upstream speed is surprisingly hard to find on the web, but values range between 1 Mbps and 6. Thus, a
1 Mbps upstream could support ~ 20 simultaneous voice calls. At .2 erlangs this is about 100
subscribers.

This doesn't include video conferencing, or other priority real time data. Even if you get 6 Mbps
upstream, this is only 600 subscribers, with no room left for data. I can see why a target of 50 homes is
a useful worst case.

I know this is a "back of the envelope" type calculation, but I expect some such thinking is behind ATT's
push for lightwire. When you can't calculate traffic, you can only architect deployment.

It also accounts for the cable companies, as you note in recent posts, are going towards a tiered, or
multi-service pricing model- the 'bandwidth hogs' must pay more.

..............................................................................................................................

The CMTS provides time slots and controls the usage for each upstream interval. The CMTS sends
regular mappings of
minislot structure in downstream broadcast MAP messages. The CMTS allocates contention broadcast
slots that all CMs can
use, and also allocates upstream minislots for unicast or non-contention data from specific CMs.


...> They expect to add for DOCSIS 1.1 the following extra features to help support vocie and fax:

Concatenation Support---DOCSIS Concatenation combines multiple upstream packets into one
packet to reduce packet overhead and overall latency, as well as increase transmission efficiency.
Using concatenation, a DOCSIS cable
modem needs to make only one bandwidth request for a concatenated packet, as opposed to making
a different
bandwidth request for each individual packet; this technique is especially effective for bursty real-time
traffic, such as
voice calls.
...
Embeddedlient Signaling (dynamic SIDs)---Supports the dynamic creation, configuration, and deletion
of Service
Identifiers (SIDs) to accommodate different classes of service. This allows cable modems to request
high-priority or
high-bandwidth data streams as needed, such as when a VoIP call is made.
...
IP Precedence-Based Rate Limiting---In addition to the currently supported traffic shaping
techniques, Cisco IOS
Release 12.1(1a)T1 supports a new configuration field that associates a maximum bandwidth (in
kbps) with a
particular setting of the IP type of service (ToS) bits. This can be used to ensure that certain traffic,
such as data, does
not exceed a pre-set rate limit and thereby interfere with higher-priority real-time traffic, such as VoIP
calls.

Support for Unsolicited Grants---New fields in the DOCSIS configuration file can be used so that
when a cable
modem requests a voice or fax SID, the MAC scheduler on the Cisco uBR7200 series router
schedules fixed periodic
slots on the upstream for that traffic flow. The cable modem does not have to contend for these slots,
and because the
Cisco uBR7200 series router controls the timing of the slots, it has a very precise control over
potential delay and
jitter. This provides a Constant Bit Rate (CBR) traffic flow for real-time traffic such as voice and fax
calls.




To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (869)9/24/2000 7:47:01 AM
From: NDBFREE  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 46821
 
MRV Communications subsidiary Luminent (and other companies)offers CWDM modules (max of 8 lamdas, I believe) at just a fraction of the cost of DWDM.
Post #869 puts the cost of individual lambdas with DWDM at $15 to $20,000 each. Anyone know price per lambda with CWDM?
Note: Believe Extreme is using CWDM with some of their latest products to reach/provide 10GB.